Friday, 29 March 2013

Black Death Media Trailer final version

Movie Poster


Magazine Cover


Evaluation Question 4

Evaluation Question 3

Evaluation Question 2

Evaluation Question 1

Psycho trailer

Psycho Trailer.





  What I like about the Psycho trailer is that it does a very good job of giving the overall plot of the story and showing key moments from the film without actually ruining what happens. Hitchcock tells the audience that the setting (the motel) has become the scene of a murder. It never shows the murder in the trailer, but from short clips of the presumed heroine (Marion Crane, played by Janet Leigh) in the shower, followed by a clip of a shadow behind a shower curtain and a further scene of a female body (undisclosed) being dragged from a bathroom. It doesn’t tell you who has been murdered or how the murder was carried out, but it does let you connect the pieces of the event in your head without, while making you hunger for more and see if it really was Marion or another character, and whether she was truly dead.

  Other clips also add to this sense of mystery, including eerie shots of Norman Bate’s (played by Anthony Perkins) motel and his mother’s house, with other shots of the swamp where Norman hides the evidence of his killings, showing the victim’s car sinking into the sludgy waters. It tells the viewer the general setting of the movie, and an act that seems rather sinister or strange, but never tells the viewer what’s significant about these places and the scenes being shown. It gives the viewer enough information to feel the need to continue their pursuit of unravelling the mystery, but doesn’t give away so much they know how the film plays out.



  I also like how the Trailer shows the supposed roles of characters, when the roles given to characters in the trailer are not the same as in the film. Using Vladimir Propp’s theory of Narrative structure on the 8 roles of characters in a fairy story, we can see that Marion is depicted as being the Heroine of the film (despite the fact that she’s the first murder victim), by giving her the most camera time in the trailer. This is firstly to show who we are meant to side with when we go and see the film, but could also be interpreted as being a red herring. We see she has the most camera time and automatically assume she will be the heroine who brings the killer to justice, so when she does get killed, it becomes an even bigger shock to those who’ve seen the trailer, as they assumed she will be the one to solve the case. In the actual film, it is more appropriate to label Marion as the princess, due to the fact that the Detective, her boyfriend and her sister go off looking for her. 

  During this trailer we also see a lot of Norman Bates, the false hero. We see many shots of him not only helping the heroes of the film, but also a lot of shots of him acting suspicious and creepy. We see him accompanying the detective, Milton Arbogast (played by Martin Balsam), but then more scenes of him looking out of windows and hilting his head over an unseen object. We can assume he is hiding something in these scenes but also that he’s trying to help, even if he’s unsure if he should or not. 

  The Villain, Norman’s mother (or, to be precise, the personality of his mother), is not shown in the trailer, partly because it would spoil the entire plot twist ending to find out who she really is, but mostly because it adds an aura of mystery to the supposed killer. We know that she is the most likely suspect, as Norman often talks about her in the trailer, and quotes “It’s not as if she were a maniac, she just does a little mad sometimes.” But with only glancing snippets of footage from the film showing the back of his mother in a chair, attacking Marion in the shower and her body being carried downstairs by her son, we never get to see the true face of his mom. The trailer allows us to make up our own images of what she may look like, which in most cases are likely to be evil or sinister looking, as well as never giving away her true identity and spoiling the ending.

  We also see a few shots of other characters, such as Det. Arbogast (the “Helper” role) as he is sent out to find Marion, Lila Crane (the “donor” role, played by Vera Miles) as she offers herself to help the investigation, and Sam Loomis (played by John Gavin). Sam can either be described as being the father figure, as he (and Lila) hired the detective to look for Marion, or the hero, as he is the overall saviour of Lila and discovers the fate of the Detective and Marion. However, in the trailer, he is simply depicted as Marion’s love interest.

  As you can see, the trailer shows off the roles of all the characters in the film so you can understand who we are to direct our attention to, however it tries to trick the viewer into believing that Marion is the hero, making it an even bigger shock to viewers when they find out she is the murder victim. To people who still haven’t seen the film, this will end up adding a twist of events that will throw them off course with how they predicted the story will turn out, making them even more scared and keeping the tension heavy.

Sinister Trailer Analysis




  From the Sinister trailer, much like the Psycho trailer, allows the viewer to get a summary of the plot without spoiling anything major in the storyline. You are introduced to the main characters, the Oswalt family, Ellison, Tracy, Trevor and Ashley (Ethan Hawke, Juliet Rylance, Michael Hall D’Abbario and Clare Foley), who are shown to move into a house 9 months after a murder took place there. From the scenes shown in the trailer, you get a good sense of Todorov’s equilibrium and disequilibrium, where in the equilibrium the Oswalt family have moved into their new house and act the same way as they have so in the past, children are disobedient and the Ellison is trying extremely hard to write a successful book. However, this equilibrium is disrupted when Ellison discovers the films and realises how many people were involved in these deaths. The new equilibrium that is present in all media texts is obviously not shown; this is a trailer and they want to entice the viewer to see the film with promising snippets that give away enough to keep the audience wanting more.

  One of the things that the trailer does well is it gives us an eerie atmosphere, due to the house chosen for the setting. The house is rather alone in the middle of nowhere, and the attic in particular is extremely claustrophobic and dark. The lighting as well is extremely moody and atmospheric, giving the viewer a sense of dread and fear as the lighting is always quite low key. One more thing that stands out in the trailer is the music, which is very subtle at the start, then gradually gets louder. It’s in a minor key, and also sounds very distorted and electrical, like static. When a jump-scare flashes on screen, the music usually becomes incredibly distorted and loud, creating a scratching noise that makes us cringe and jump. These are quite common in a traditional horror film trailer, and when the viewer sees this, they should become very aware what they are viewing and (if they are horror fans) draw their attention.

There are many themes in this trailer, most noticeably a supernatural theme. This theme is very strong throughout the trailer, as you can see throughout it scenes pictures of pagan rituals, demonic symbols and blood on the wall. However, the strongest supernatural theme in the film is the use of the main antagonist, Bughuul (Nicholas King), and the spirits of the dead children he’s captured. We can see this through the makeup first through the makeup of both the children and Bughuul, the children being pale and damp with dark eye sockets and cracking skin, while Bughuul is wearing all black with white and black makeup that almost resembles war paint. Through second observation, we see that he has supernatural powers and is a formidable, intimidating antagonist. We first see his supernatural abilities when Ellison holds the picture of Bughuul up to the window to align the scenery with his back garden. When he removes the photo, Bughuul is standing in the same spot he was standing in the photo, before disappearing again. We see this a second and third time, secondly when the still picture of him on Ellison’s computer begins to turn his head and stare at Ellison, and thirdly when Ellison enters the attic to find the dead children watching the tapes, and Bughuul jumps out of nowhere in front of the camera. Other themes of supernaturalism can be seen when Trevor’s body rises up from the cardboard box and screams at the camera, as well as when one of Ellison’s helpers was describing Bughuul and telling the audience he’s a pagan god who devours children. The use of this supernatural element not only tells us what sub genre of horror movie this is (supernatural, psychological, ect), it also adds a sense of mystery to the trailer and makes the viewer want to find out what type of supernatural being this antagonist is, making them want to watch the film and see the mystery unfold.

When discussing themes, we can also relate back to Claude Levi-Strauss, as his narrative theory on binary opposites relate directly to opposing themes. There are a few opposing themes we can see in this trailer, such as safety and danger, night and day and family and murder/ life and death. With safety and danger and light and dark, they are both heavily linked. The family and Ellison all seem to be very safe during the day time, Ellison can concentrate on his family and work and everything seems to be happy or normal. During the night/ dark, bad things happen, such as Trevor’s body rising from the box, the appearance of the dead children and the timely appearances of Bughuul. With family and murder (or life and death) we see a contrast of the two a lot of the time when watching short snippets of the old film reels. We first see the old family who lived in the house before the Oswalts, and then we see them all hanging themselves/ being murdered immediately after. This huge contrast between the scenes has huge impact on the viewers, who watch the trailer casually, then snap to attention in fear when the scene of the family being hung gets thrown onto the screen in a flash.

All of these uses of contrasting themes can be very effective on the viewers. When watching the trailer, the quick cuts to seemingly safe, suburban life to horror and death create a feeling of constant unease. While watching just the safe suburban lifestyle, it will keep the audience continuously feeling safe no matter how much you try to advertise it to horror fans, while if keeping it constantly on the horror, the viewer may feel like it’s trying to be shoved in their faces too much, or may become desensitised to it. With this montage of scenes, cutting back and forth between safe and unsafe, it keeps the viewer on edge for what may pop out next.

The Descent Analysis





 In the Descent trailer, the audience is introduced the main characters and the overall plot of the film. Right from the start of the film, we are introduced to the characters through a scene of them all posing in front of their log cabin for a photo. We see Sarah (Shauna McDonald), Juno (Natalie Mendoza) Beth (Alex Reid), Rebecca (Saskia Mulder), Sam (MyAnna Buring) and Holly (Nora-Jane Noone) all posing outside of their cabin, which tells the viewer of the trailer who the main protagonists are and who we’re meant to route for. When looking at characters, we could relate back to Vladimir Propp’s theory on character roles in narrative structure, however, due to the nature of the trailer it’s hard to pinpoint character roles. As you can see, the lighting for the entire trailer has very low key lighting; due to the fact the setting is an underground cave. However, you can just about make out that Sarah is supposedly the lead role, or “hero”, as she gets the most camera time. She is also most likely going to be Clover’s final girl, as she was the first one to point out in the trailer that she saw something. The identification with characters and their roles is important in media texts; however in this trailer they don’t make the roles of the characters very clear. Due to the nature of the film, being the film is set in a claustrophobic cave, this may be because they want to add an air of the unknown to the film and make it even more mysterious. The unknown can be very pressing sometimes when frightened, and the use of this may help add to the theme of claustrophobia to the trailer.

  As said previously, the atmosphere is very claustrophobic in the trailer. This is mostly to do with the fact that near enough the entire trailer takes place in an underground cavern with very low key lighting, but also because of the music. Much like the Sinister trailer, the music begins very quietly at the beginning and then gradually crescendos to a very loud climax, and the overall music is more of a hum rather than a score with a noticeable tempo to it. During jump-scares, it very suddenly climaxes so it’s extremely loud and sharp to the ear, making the viewers jump more. As stated in the Sinister trailer analysis, this is all very common to horror fans and these factors will draw their attention.

  There are many iconic images that can be seen here that relate to both horror and cave exploration. For example, during a montage of clips while quotes from critics hover on screen, there was a scene when one of the characters rises up from a pool of blood extremely slowly. This is an iconic image of what we expect from horror films, something weird and horrifying that we would see in a nightmare, and is also similar to other horror films scenes where monsters rise up from the mud of pools of slime. Another scene is a small clip of a knife flashing through the air, while it makes a swishing, screeching noise. This noise of the knife coming down and piercing flesh is very iconic as a sound effect used in other horror movies, such as slashers. When considering cave exploration, you can see the typical equipment of an explorer or an extreme sportsman would don being worn by the protagonists, such as utility belts, flashlight hats, flares and hand picks. This tells us that this horror movie is all about explorers, and the setting shows them being underground, with the iconic images of stalagmites and stalactites adorning the cave ceilings and floors, which tell us that this movie will all be about what these adventurers find down in this cave. All of these iconic images, settings, items and noises used are here to make the whole setting and plot more believable, as we all automatically expect cave explorers to have mountain climbing equipment and exploration gear, as well as try and entice horror fans to come and see the film.

Halloween and The Crazies



  John Carpenter’s 1978 film Halloween and Breck Eisner’s 2010 remake of The Crazies contains many uses of the 4 theories of narrative structure.


Tzventan Todorov


  Todorov’s theories on narrative structure suggest that all narratives have 3 stages or “equilibriums.” There is a state of initial “status quo” equilibrium where life for the characters are normal/ the forces of good and evil are balanced. This is then disrupted by some sort of event, usually the case of evil overbalancing the forces of good. This disequilibrium causes the heroes of the narrative to go and try and restore the status quo, and at the end of the narrative there is a new equilibrium. This new equilibrium provides some sort of closure to the story, and can either be good or bad, depending on the genre of narrative and how the narrative plays out throughout the entire text.

  In Halloween the narrative still follows this path. We have the initial equilibrium, where Laurie and her friends live happily in their suburban life, then the event of Michael Myers escaping from the lunatic asylum through Dr. Loomis’s car causes disequilibrium, after which he then stalks and murders Laurie’s friends and attempts to murder her. The new equilibrium then provides a form of closure, showing us that Dr Loomis saves Laurie from Myers by shooting him off the balcony, only for Myers to escape again. This type of conclusion adds to the theme of mystery, tension and fear throughout the film, as Myer’s survival tells the audience that they’re still not safe and Myers could still be hiding anywhere, waiting to strike.

  In The Crazies the initial status quo equilibrium shows that the town and its inhabitants. They live regular lives in this small place where everybody knows everybody. Then the status quo is disrupted and a new equilibrium emerges when the David interrupts the Baseball game by shooting a local resident, Rory, when he arrives bearing a shotgun, as well as when a local farmer burns down his own house with his wife and child still inside. Something is definitely not right with the people of the town, and when the military show up, David, his Wife Judy and Deputy Russell Clank, discover that the military accidently unleashed a bio-weapon on the town. The new equilibrium shows us that David and Judy escape, only for the military to hunt them down and quarantine the city they are headed to. Much like Halloween, this leaves the ending open so viewers can wonder what happens next, and adds a sense of dread as you know that the military will attempt to exterminate the protagonists and the rest of the city.


Vladimir Propp


  Propp’s theories on narrative structure suggest that in every story there are 8 main roles filled by certain characters encountered throughout the story. By comparing fairy tale stories, he has discovered that the 8 main roles of characters in films are:
·        * The Hero.
·        * The Villain.
·        * The Donor (the character who provides the hero with a magical or powerful object).
·        * The Helper (the character who aids the hero).
·        * The Princess (the reward for the hero, the sought after person and object of the villains schemes).
·        * Her Father (the man to give the reward).
·        * The Dispatcher (the character who sends the hero on the quest).
·        * The false hero.

  In Halloween, we can label many of the on screen characters with Propp’s roles. The first two obvious roles are the roles of Laurie (the hero) and Myers (the villain). In Halloween Laurie is the hero as she gets the most screen time and she has the most important role; namely discovering who murdered her friends and to protect the two children Tommy and Lindsey from Myers. Myers is the villain as he is the one who causes the disequilibrium by escaping the asylum and hunting down Laurie and her friends. He also stalks and murders Annie, Bob and Lynda, and attempts to thwart the hero by murdering her. The helper in the film is Dr Loomis, the psychiatrist of Myers, who attempts to track down Myers and aids both the Police and Laurie in finding and stopping him. The false hero can be seen as being the Sheriff, Annie’s father, as although he wants to help find Myers he also dismisses Loomis and eagerly tries to force himself into believing Myers isn’t as much as a threat Loomis makes him out to be. If he had listened to Loomis then many of the murders throughout the film could have been avoided.

  However other roles such as the donor, father and dispatcher are seemingly lacking in the film. The 3 other teens, Annie, Lynda and Bob can be referred to as they are the objects of the villains schemes (being to murder teens), as well as being sought after by Laurie after Lynda’s disturbing phone call as she was being strangled by Myers. Yet the other roles are unfulfilled, which maybe because of the nature of the slasher/ horror genre of because there was no need of those roles in this particular narrative text.

  In The Crazies, the main role of Hero is given to David, as he is the character with the most screen time and the character who’s given role of protecting his wife and escaping the town. In the film there is no obvious villain, only the townsfolk infected by the virus and the military, with no single figure that stands out as a leader or villain. There is no obvious Donor either, however the driver of the government SUV who Russell interrogates and kills could possibly be one, as it was through him that the protagonists discover about the virus and how the military accidently unleashed it. The Helper is Russell, David’s deputy and best friend. Russell is noticeably infected with the virus half way through the film, and when he himself realises this he offers to sacrifice himself so that David and Judy have a chance of surviving. Judy, David’s wife, can be labelled as the Princess, as she’s the character that David strives to save. He escapes the military camp especially to find her, and he is always the first to try and save her when she’s in danger. She is also pregnant, which makes her extremely vulnerable and (seemingly) the target of many of the infected civilians. The Father and the dispatcher roles do not seem to be present in any of the characters, as Judy (the princess) is independent from all of the characters aside from David, who is the hero, making Judy his princess or “reward,” and the group of survivors are not given their quest by a dispatcher, as they figure out their plan of action by themselves. The False Hero can be seen as being Mayor Hobbs, as he refuses to help David by not shutting off the water supply for the town and crops, as the virus is spread through the water. If it wasn’t for him a lot less people wouldn’t have been infected.


Claude Levi-Strauss


  Levi-Strauss’ theory on narrative structure suggests that narrative texts contain many binary opposites. An example of this would be good and evil, as both are the direct opposite of each other. These binary oppositions help us to understand deeper themes of the media text.

  In Halloween, we can put use Levi-Strauss’ theory to help understand the deeper arrangements and meaning of themes in the film. Firstly, one of the first binary opposites present in the media text is Sanity and Insanity. Sanity, held by Dr Loomis and Laurie, shows strength and determination during the periods of fear when Myers attacks them, while insanity, held by Myers, shows how cold he is and how he has no regard for life, killing when and where he likes with no emotion. This can also be linked with Courage and fear, Laurie and her friends being fearful of Myers while Loomis acts with courage against him. An obvious binary opposite is good and evil, Laurie representing good as she babysits the kids, while Myers is evil, as he murders the teens. Laurie could also be represented as good by the fact that she is a virgin, being that the other teens had all had sex (either on-screen or having it referred to off screen) and had ended up being killed by Myers. As Laurie is a very virginal character who doesn’t drink, smoke, have sex or gets into mischief with her friends she ends up being the hero who helps defeat Myers (this character profile or role is known as the “Final Girl” in horror/ slasher movies). More themes include safety and danger, safety referring to the suburban neighbourhood and danger referring to Myer’s old house. The American suburban town is very often seen as a safe, secure area to bring up children and to settle down, and isn’t often seen as a dangerous area, while Myer’s house is dangerous as it’s dilapidated and weatherworn as it’s old and abandoned. This binary opposite also heavily linked to Day and Night, or Light and Dark. During the day or when the lights are on in the house, the characters are safe from Myers as he only seems to observe them at most, while during the night or when the house is dark, Myers attempts to make his moves to kill the teens and succeeds in murdering 3 teens during the cover of darkness.

  In The Crazies, there are many themes that can also be seen in Halloween, such as insanity and sanity, courage and fear, good and evil and safety and danger. Insanity is held by the infected, as they kill for no good reason and without an emotional response to what they’ve done due to the virus, while the survivors are sane and try to act rationally to their situation and attempt to escape the town without becoming infected themselves. With fear and courage, the girl Becca can be used to represent fear, as well as many other of the unnamed civilians seen throughout the town, as she is extremely frightful for her life and needs David and Judy to help her through the difficult times surviving the military and the infected, while courage is held by Judy, David and Russell as they have to stay strong to survive. Courage can be seen particularly in Russell, as he knows he is infected and offers to sacrifice himself so David and Judy have a chance of escaping. With the two binary opposites good and evil, we can see that the survivors represent good, the few who aren’t infected fighting against the impossible forces of the infected and the military combined, while the infected and military are represented as evil; the infected as they are insane and extremely hostile, the military for attempting to exterminate the townsfolk. Another thing in the crazies that could represent good is the town itself. The town is the model of a small, American farming community where everyone is friends with everyone and people feel safe. When the military bring their bio-weapon virus down upon them, the townsfolk are no longer represented as “good” as they have been infected. This relates to safety and danger, as the whole town can be seen as a safe haven; small, tight-knit and friendly. However, the military camps or deserted farm land can be seen as dangerous, the camps are they are heavily controlled by the military to help exterminate the townsfolk and infected, making them dangerous, as well as the open farm land as there is no shelter from the military helicopters or infected. As well as all that has been mentioned in Halloween, there are other themes that can be seen in The Crazies. Love and hate, which related closely to sanity and insanity, is present throughout the whole film. Love can be seen between David and Judy, they both love each other to the point that they would die for one another, and the presence of Judy’s unborn child helps strengthen this love. Love (or friendship) can also be seen between David and Russell, as they are extremely close friends and companions. However, hate can also be seen between David and Russell once Russell gets infected. He becomes extremely aggravated by what the survivors do, and what threatens to kill David and Judy at one point. Although this hatred is forced onto Russell due to the virus, it’s very obviously there throughout the middle sections of the film. Hate can also be seen throughout the infected town folk, where the unnamed farmer burnt his house down with his wife and child, and where the coroner attacked David with the saw.


Bordwell and Thompson


  Bordwell and Thompson’s theory on narrative structure defines a narrative as “a chain of events in a cause-and-effect relationship, occurring in time and space.”  While we view the important scenes of the narrative onscreen during the movie, there are many events that are directly linked to the story but happened off screen.

  In Halloween, there is an example of this when Dr Loomis describes to the sheriff about how he studied Myers, saying “I watched him for fifteen years, sitting in a room, staring at a wall, not seeing the wall, looking past the wall, looking at this night, inhumanly patient, waiting for some secret, silent alarm to trigger him off.” Loomis talks about something story important which isn’t shown during the film. This is because it’s an extremely long event that takes 15 years to tell, and it would take too long to show in film. Another example is when Loomis is tracking Myers and he tracks him to a gas station, and you see the corpse of the truck driver. The murder was not seen, but due to the editing and linking Loomis tracking Myer, we assume that Myers killed the trucker. This is important for Halloween as it allows us to see the main points of the film (mainly Myers killing teenagers) while also being informed of other critical plot points in quick explanations. It also allows us to use our minds to link up evidence and keeps the viewer guessing and looking out for clues.

  In The Crazies, there is an example of this in the very first scene, where you see the town of Ogden Marsh on fire. There are no civilians in sight, and cars are lit on fire whilst the town’s banner falls to the floor in a burning fireball. In then cuts to black and on screen text comes up saying “Two Days Earlier.” This is used to show us that in the near future something terrible will happen to the small town, which is used to help pull in the viewers and get them engrossed in the film. Another example of this theory is when David and Russell are investigating the dead pilot out in the marsh and start looking for the plane. Russell says “last week Travis Clune was goin’ around sayin’ he heard somethin’ crash out by hopnin’ bog.” We do not see the crash, but using our imagination we can gather that the death of the pilot and the sound of something crashing are link and make a mental connection that the dead pilot was piloting whatever it was that crashed.


Conclusion


  The most important theorist on narrative structures would most likely be Levi-Strauss, as his theory allows us to delve deeper into the themes of Halloween and The Crazies, helping the director create meaningful sets and characters which fit in with the slasher genre. Levi-Strauss and Binary Opposites allowed us to see two opposing themes in narratives, which can be used to cause conflict and drama in the plot.

The Representation of Women in Horror films

  In horror films, women are often important to the overall plot and have key roles in the film. In the slasher genre many people think women are often depicted as being the victims of murder and torture, the characters the murderers are out to get. However are women roles in horrors simply for heterosexual males to objectify or are their roles more subtle and used to redefine what it is to be a heroine?


  In this essay I will be exploring the roles of female characters in the Horror genre. I will be looking at the two theorists, Laura Mulvey and Carol J. Clover, who both have their own opinions on a woman’s role in horror films. By examining the four films Halloween, The Crazies (2010), Sinister and Psycho, I will decide on which theorist I agree with the most on their opinions on a female’s role in Horrors.



  For my essay, I have watched four films. These films were Halloween, The Crazies, Sinister and Psycho. Halloween, the 1978 slasher horror is a film about an escaped mental patient at an asylum who returns to his home town and kills groups of teenagers on Halloween night, the same night he killed his own sister fifteen years before. The Crazies (2010 remake) is set in a small American town where an outbreak of a biological weapon infects its residents turning them into mindless killers. Sinister, a 2012 psychological horror/ ghost story centres on a writer and his family who live in the house of a murder scene, only to find out they are being stalked by a maniacal entity attempting to torment and kill them. Lastly, Alfred Hitchcock’s 1960 movie Psycho takes place at a small motel, where Janet Leigh’s character Marion is murdered and her lover Sam Loomis (John Gavin), Sister Lila Crane (Vera Miles) and Detective Arbogast (Martin Balsam) go off to investigate her disappearance.


  All of the above films include the appearance of a female role; however in each case they are slightly different, ranging from main characters to supporting roles. In Halloween, Jamie Lee Curtis’s character Laurie is considered a heroine, a bit boyish and ends up being the character that fights off Michael Myers and protects the children. In The Crazies, Radha Mitchell’s character Judy is the pregnant house wife of a sheriff, and therefore always relies upon him to save her. In Sinister, Tracy (Juliet Rylance) is shown as someone with very strong opinions on the work her Husband Ellison (Ethan Hawke) does. She has a large influence on him and shows to be a strong mother-type figure. Finally in Psycho, Marion Crane is portrayed as a rebellious character who steals $40,000 from the company she works at, but ends up getting her comeuppance and gets murdered half way through the film, even though Hitchcock gives her the most camera time during the beginning of the film, making the audience assume she would be the heroine of the film. In the same film, Lila Crane is made out to be a “Damsel in Distress” character that ends up being saved by Sam.


  However, in Psycho, Lila Crane is also depicted as intelligent, due to how she discovers that Norman is the killer before Sam and the late Detective Arbogast. Despite her physical weakness (shown when she is attacked by Norman Bates) she is represented as a heroine. Clover’s “Final Girl” is the name given to a female role in movies (particularly the slasher genre) that end up being the heroine or the strongest out of all the other characters. The final girl is usually virginal, organised or alert (being that she avoids the vices of the other victims, such as drugs, sex and alcohol), often has a few masculine qualities about her and ultimately fights back against the killer. For example, Lila Crane can be described as a final girl as she isn’t known to be in a relationship and has a sharp intelligence. Another example of a final girl is Laurie from Halloween, who isn’t in a sexual relationship or drink alcohol. While her friends are being murdered because they were off drinking and having sex instead of paying attention to all the warning signs of Myers’ presence, she keeps keen eyes on him and stayed alert throughout the film. She ends up fighting off Myers as well as using her intelligence and wits to keep her and the children safe.

 

  Clover argues that the final girl is the character that the mostly male audience identify with, not the killer, and that although they are the victims, they are usually strong willed and determined to live. Clover suggests there are many reasons for the audience (particularly the male audience) to affiliate themselves with the final girl rather than the killer, such as they identify with the fright of being attacked, and that they see the final girl as someone who remains quite masculine, strong and independent, but also feminine enough to be sexualised and fantasied by the male audience.



  However, the critic Laura Mulvey believes that the female characters in movies are the opposite of what Clover believes. Mulvey believes that women are objectified in movies, made out to be things of heterosexual male’s pleasure. Female protagonists like Angelina Jolie in Lara Croft: Tomb Raider is considered to be a step back from earlier heroines (being she is portrayed as a very sexualised character only there for the male audience to “enjoy”), and Mulvey believes women are treated like objects in movies. One of the ways this can be backed up is the POV camera strategy of tilting the camera from the bottom of the legs to the chest area/ bottom of the head, mimicking the gaze of a heterosexual male looking up a woman. This can be seen in Halloween, when Myers is peering through the kitchen window of Annie’s house whilst Annie takes her clothes off as she had spilt butter down her shirt. The camera takes on a POV approach to the scene, making the audience see through the eyes of Myers and how he watches Annie get undressed. This can also be seen in Psycho, where Norman Bates peers through the hole in the wall watching Marion get ready for her shower. This helps to prove Mulvey’s theories that women are often objectified in movies and that they are only included to sexualise the movie and provide eye candy for the heterosexual males.



  These two critics have very different views on how women are treated in films and the horror genre. On one hand, Clover is correct saying that there’s often a “final girl,” who is strong and empowered who ends up defeating or escaping the villain, while Mulvey is also correct saying that women are often seen “through the eyes of a man.” Clover’s “Final Girl,” the heroine who is escape or defeat the villain, is often physically weak, often shown to cower in immediate danger and tends to be attractive, someone who the male viewers could not only support but feel attracted to. However, while it is true that women are often shown to be attractive and pretty, they are also shown to be strong, independent and quick witted in certain situations, as Clover’s “Final Girl” shows. They are often shown to be more reliable than males in horrors too, as males tend to be stupid or careless and end up getting killed relatively quickly. Many other critics also commented on Mulvey’s beliefs, saying that, if what she said was true, it would be impossible for females or gay males to enjoy classical Hollywood films, as all they do is cater for a straight male’s fantasies and desires from women.


In conclusion, I believe that Carol J. Clover has the strongest argument on females in the horror genre, as it always seems to be the females who are strong in the face of danger and end up outsmarting both the villain and the other male companions. Some examples of the final girl outsmarting or escaping the villain are Halloween, where Laurie defeats Myers with the help of Dr Loomis, Friday the 13th, where Alice manages to cut the head off Mrs Voorhes, Psycho, in which Lila manages to uncover the secret of Norman Bates and solves the murder case, Texas Chainsaw Massacre, where Sally escapes Leatherface, and Jennifer’s Body, where Needy manages to stab Jennifer in the heart.